Bibliography#
How to cite#
When using thebeat in your research, please cite using the following reference:
van der Werff, J., Ravignani, A., & Jadoul, Y. (2023). thebeat: A Python package for working with rhythms and other temporal sequences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
@unpublished{vanderwerffThebeatPythonPackage2023,
title = {thebeat: {{A Python}} Package for Working with Rhythms and Other Temporal Sequences},
author = {{van der Werff}, Jelle and Ravignani, Andrea and Jadoul, Yannick},
year = {2023},
note = {Manuscript submitted for publication}
}
References#
References mentioned in the documentation are listed below.
Lara S. Burchardt, Elodie F. Briefer, and Mirjam Knörnschild. Novel ideas to further expand the applicability of rhythm analysis. Ecology and Evolution, 11(24):18229–18237, 2021. doi:10.1002/ece3.8417.
Nori Jacoby and Josh H. McDermott. Integer ratio priors on musical rhythm revealed cross-culturally by iterated reproduction. Current Biology, 27(3):359–370, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.031.
Yannick Jadoul, Andrea Ravignani, Bill Thompson, Piera Filippi, and Bart de Boer. Seeking temporal predictability in speech: comparing statistical approaches on 18 world languages. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00586.
Olaf Post and Godfried Toussaint. The edit distance as a measure of perceived rhythmic similarity. Empirical Musicology Review, 6(3):164–179, 2011. doi:10.18061/1811/52811.
Andrea Ravignani and Philipp Norton. Measuring rhythmic complexity: a primer to quantify and compare temporal structure in speech, movement, and animal vocalizations. Journal of Language Evolution, 2(1):4–19, 2017. doi:10.1093/jole/lzx002.
Tina C. Roeske, Ofer Tchernichovski, David Poeppel, and Nori Jacoby. Categorical rhythms are shared between songbirds and humans. Current Biology, 30(18):3544–3555.e6, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.072.